Quick Answer: The Roborock Qrevo Slim is built around one idea: a 3.2-inch-tall chassis — versus the roughly 4 inches typical of LiDAR robot vacuums — that fits under low furniture other robots can’t reach. Vacuum Wars measured a 3.50/5 overall score with obstacle avoidance ranking #3 overall (4.28/5) thanks to a full sensor stack (LiDAR, 3D time-of-flight, RGB camera) packed into that thin body, plus 76% deep-carpet pickup and 80% pet-hair pickup on carpet — both roughly in line with pricier Qrevo siblings. The tradeoffs for the slim design: a 220ml dustbin Vacuum Wars called “really small,” and raw suction that benched below category average despite the claimed 11,000Pa figure. Roborock lists it at $1,399.99 but it has repeatedly sold for around $699.99.
Roborock’s Qrevo family keeps adding entries that differ by dock shape or a few hundred Pa rather than anything fundamental — Qrevo S, Qrevo Pro, Qrevo Master, Qrevo Curv, Qrevo Edge. The Qrevo Slim, launched at IFA 2024 and in US stores by October 2024, is the one entry in that lineup built around a genuinely different constraint: fitting under furniture. Roborock’s own product page bills it as an “upgrade from the Qrevo Master,” which makes the Master a useful baseline for what actually changed — and what didn’t.
Roborock Qrevo Slim by the numbers
- 3.2 inches tall, compared with the roughly 4 inches typical of LiDAR-equipped robot vacuums — the entire design brief, per Roborock and confirmed by Vacuum Wars’ hands-on testing.
- 11,000Pa claimed suction — more than the Qrevo Master’s 10,000Pa, but well below the Qrevo Curv’s 18,500Pa or Saros 10R’s 19,000Pa. Vacuum Wars’ bench measurements found raw suction ran below category average regardless.
- 76% deep-carpet pickup, per Vacuum Wars — competitive with similarly priced Qrevo siblings.
- 80% pet-hair pickup on carpet (category average 78%) and a 4.33/5 pet-features score, per Vacuum Wars.
- Obstacle avoidance scored 4.28/5, ranking #3 overall in Vacuum Wars’ comparison — notable given how few sensors typically fit in a 3.2-inch body.
- 220ml dustbin, which Vacuum Wars flagged directly as “really small.”
- Price gap: $1,399.99 MSRP vs. a repeated ~$699.99 sale price on Amazon during 2026 promotions — about a $700 cut.
Roborock Qrevo Slim Robot Vacuum
- Obstacle avoidance ranked #3 overall in Vacuum Wars' testing — strong for a chassis this thin.
- 76% deep-carpet and 80% pet-hair pickup, both competitive with pricier Qrevo siblings.
- Tradeoffs: a 220ml dustbin and raw suction that benched below category average.
If low furniture clearance is what’s kept you from buying a robot vacuum until now, this is the one category where it’s worth ordering sooner rather than waiting for a sale to expire — get your new robot vacuum in two days with a free 30-day trial of Amazon Prime.
The 3.2-inch chassis: the whole point of this robot
Most LiDAR robot vacuums stand close to 4 inches tall because the spinning LiDAR turret needs somewhere to live. The Qrevo Slim’s engineering brief was to shrink that down to 3.2 inches while keeping full navigation — it does this with Roborock’s StarSense Navigation, which combines side-mounted sensors, front obstacle-avoidance sensors, dual-state solid-state LiDAR, 3D time-of-flight tech, an RGB camera and infrared sensors, rather than one tall spinning unit. If a couch, bed frame, or low cabinet has been a permanently unreachable strip of floor, this is the model built specifically to solve that problem — worth checking your furniture clearance against 3.2 inches before assuming any robot vacuum can’t fit.
Cleaning performance: competitive, not class-leading
Vacuum Wars measured 76% deep-carpet pickup, in line with similarly priced Qrevo models, and 80% pet-hair pickup on carpet against a 78% category average — solid, workable numbers rather than top-of-category ones. Crevice pickup scored 2.5, above average, and the dried-stain mopping test came in at 110 points, also above average. None of these are the Slim’s standout result, but none are a weak point either — for a household comparing pet-hair performance more broadly, see our best robot vacuum for pet hair guide.
Obstacle avoidance: the genuine standout
This is where the Qrevo Slim earns its keep. Despite the ultra-thin body, Vacuum Wars scored its obstacle avoidance at 4.28/5, ranking #3 overall in their comparison set — a result that would be notable on any robot, let alone one built around shrinking its sensor housing. The one caveat Vacuum Wars raised: the robot “struggled slightly during zone cleaning runs when furniture was moved,” suggesting its mapping is somewhat sensitive to layout changes rather than a pure sensor-quality issue.
Where the slim design costs you: suction and bin size
Two numbers reflect the tradeoff for that 3.2-inch body. First, raw suction benched below category average in Vacuum Wars’ lab testing despite the claimed 11,000Pa figure — consistent with the broader pattern across this category where manufacturer Pa ratings and lab-measured suction frequently diverge. Second, the 220ml dustbin is small enough that Vacuum Wars called it out directly (“getting so small”), which means more frequent auto-empty cycles at the dock even though you won’t be manually emptying it often. Neither is disqualifying on its own, but both are the direct cost of the thinner chassis, not an unrelated flaw.
Qrevo Slim vs. Qrevo Master: what actually changed
Roborock’s own store bills the Slim as an “upgrade from the Qrevo Master,” so it’s worth being precise about what upgraded. Suction climbed marginally, from the Master’s 10,000Pa claim to the Slim’s 11,000Pa, and the chassis dropped from roughly 4 inches to 3.2 inches for under-furniture access. What didn’t change: both ship with a similarly small ~220ml dustbin — a complaint Vacuum Wars raised on the Master too, and one that carries over unchanged rather than being fixed in this “upgrade.” If bin capacity matters more to you than furniture clearance, the Master’s larger footprint doesn’t buy you a bigger bin. Full detail in our Qrevo Master review.
Specs at a glance
| Spec | Roborock Qrevo Slim |
|---|---|
| Height | 3.2in (vs. ~4in typical for LiDAR robots) |
| Claimed suction | 11,000Pa |
| Measured suction | Below category average — Vacuum Wars bench testing |
| Navigation | StarSense Navigation: LiDAR + 3D time-of-flight + RGB camera + IR sensors |
| Overall score | 3.50/5 — Vacuum Wars |
| Obstacle avoidance | 4.28/5, #3 overall — Vacuum Wars |
| Deep-carpet pickup | 76% — Vacuum Wars |
| Pet-hair pickup | 80% (avg 78%) — Vacuum Wars |
| Dustbin | 220ml — "really small" per Vacuum Wars |
| Battery (claimed) | 180 min on low power |
| Measured coverage | ~1,244 sq ft per charge — Vacuum Wars |
| Price | $1,399.99 MSRP, repeatedly ~$699.99 on sale |
Overall, obstacle-avoidance, carpet, pet-hair and coverage figures are Vacuum Wars’ measured test results. Suction and battery figures are Roborock’s published claims unless noted as measured.
Who should buy the Roborock Qrevo Slim
- Buy it if low furniture clearance has ruled out other robot vacuums — the 3.2-inch chassis is the whole reason this model exists.
- Buy it if you want strong obstacle avoidance without paying flagship prices — a #3 overall ranking from Vacuum Wars is a rare result at this price tier.
- Skip it if dustbin capacity matters more to you than under-furniture access — 220ml means more frequent dock auto-empty cycles.
- Skip it if you’re chasing the highest raw suction — the Qrevo Curv or Saros 10R both measure and claim more.
The bottom line
The Roborock Qrevo Slim is a genuinely purpose-built robot rather than another generic Qrevo variant: it trades some suction and dustbin capacity for a 3.2-inch body that fits where taller robots physically cannot, and still manages a #3-overall obstacle-avoidance ranking from Vacuum Wars in the process. At its recurring ~$699.99 sale price it’s a reasonable buy for the specific furniture-clearance problem it solves; at the full $1,399.99 list price, Roborock’s own higher-suction, larger-bin siblings are a better use of the money. For the wider field, start with our best robot vacuum rankings, or see how it compares directly to the model it supersedes in our Qrevo Master review.